Existentialism in the novel "Waiting For the Barbarians"
MAHARAJAKRISHNAKUMARSINHJI BHAVNAGAR
UNIVERSITY,BHAVNAGAR
Smt. S.B.GARDI DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH
Name: Bhumi Vinodbhai Joshi
Sem - 4
Roll No : 2
PG Enrollment No : PG14101020
Email Id: bhumivjoshi108@gmail.com
Paper Name : 14 The African Literature
Assignment Sub :
'Existentialism in the novel - 'Waiting for the Barbarians '
v Preface:
African Literature is history of Slavery, oppression or
suppression, violence and humiliations
of their life. This literature is not for Entertainment, not for Aesthetic
delight but such literature disturb
the mind leads to think about Humanity
and so many other things. This literature is not written with Out of Compassion but it is written
out of Disgustful life which is experienced by writers themselves. Flood
of Colonialism, Capitalism and Industrialism lead them
towards salve mentality and they suffer from agony and pain.
We can’t enjoy the narration of any text because
writers have no good memories to write
then how can we expect that they write something romantic or anything else when
their lives itself in danger or mental states are in trauma. They
are suffering from Dominant power and live in fear. They cannot explore their ‘Feelings and
Emotions’ as human beings because they are not treated like as Human
Beings.
- What is to be South African writer ?
A
Great commanding subject haunts the South Africans imagination, Yet this
subject can also turn into a kind of tyranny, close, oppressive, even destructive.
It means an endless clamor or news about racial injustice, the feeling that
one's life is mortgaged to a society gone rotten with hatred, an indignation
that exhausts itself into depression, the fear of one's anger may overwhelm and
destroy one's fiction. And except for silence or emigration , there can be no
relief.
- About Writer :
John
Maxwell Coetzee South African writer who
is a novelist, essayist, translator and recipient of the Nobel prize in
Literature 2003. He focuses on power. The novel ‘Waiting for Barbarian' was published 1980. His philosophical depth
and stylistic brilliance put him as
rival of Kafka and Beckett. He was born in Cape Town ,South Africa, in 1940 educated
in south Africa and United States.
The title of the novel is borrowed from C.P. Cavafy’s poem with the same title : 'Waiting for the Barbarians'. This text gives the most prominent voice to The Post colonial literature. In the novel we can find out the absurdity without name of narrator and without unnamed empire which is existed without historical and geographical setting. The novel is the empire that.........
“Must expand, either by transforming the other, wiping
it from the face of the earth”.
'Waiting
For the Barbarians' is all about 'We' and 'Others'
or 'We' and 'They'. Means it depends on existential crisis. One's
identity and existence depends on Other. Novel raises the question of conflict
between civilization and Barbadians. But who decides who is civilised and
who are Barbarians? The Barbarians represents a kind of outside threat which
seek to trample on the security and safety of the people of the empire. There
is also the reflection of power relation
between Civilised and Barbarians means White and Blacks. Anxiety and fear remains
from the beginning of the novel until the end of it.
Ø Power Relation :
This
novel can be read as power exist between
the oppressor and the oppressed. Dominant
power, sexual authority over women, and political power are there. Idea of losing such power over other creates
the existential crisis. Indirectly suggested that then there is no master slave
relationship. How can we define one as 'Master'? It is only possible when there is the
existence of 'Slave'. So , idea of identity is depended on 'Others' rather than
'Us'.
Ø Conflict between 'We' and 'They' :
Empire is living under the threat
that 'Barbarians' are going to attack on empire. To whom we call Barbarian?
people who are not belonging our community or outsider to whom we call
Barbarian. Means ....'They' are barbarians. So, when we define 'They'
as different from us, we automatically give the identity to ourselves as 'We'.
Do Barbarian exist or not? Who
knows ? but ....repeatedly liens come in
the novel that............."Because barbarians are coming today."
Borders are defended and attacked, questioned
and crossed, made to stand for what is
within and what is without. The concept
of 'we' and 'They' depends on thinking capacity and ability to define the
things. When` people considered the
country is as our or as a part of empire, settlements and have some conscious
feeling with the place they define themselves as 'We' putting themselves as in
center. And when Native people define outsider as visitors putting them out of
center means in margin , they become 'Other' or 'They' for them.
We gives binary opposition to identity with anxiety of
existence. If they come what happens
with us ? I think people of empire don't much conscious about barbarian identity but they
constantly think about their own identity. because they don't know whether they
exist or not?
“Now what’s going to happen to us without Barbarians? Those people were a
kind of solution." ( Waiting for the Barbarians)
Magistrate and Third Bureau are
in search of barbarian - the enemy so
that barbarian can't destroy the empire. but, actually they all are in search
of themselves or their own identity. Sometime
strangeness creates a fear and then people depict them as 'Barbarians '
or 'Others.'
Ø Civilized Society v/s Barbarian Society:
A civilization is any complex
society characterized by urban development, symbolic communication forms, and a
perceived separation from and domination over the natural environment by a
cultural elite. It has own different rules and regulations to follow and also
have the power.
Barbarians are defined by civilized with the comparison of them. So Civilized society depict them as uncultured, savages and
animals kind of things. So, civilized society gives the identity to Barbarian as "Other" in the society
and make themselves as superior.
Civilized society do harm the
barbarian with softness as Magistrate does in the novel. They uses everything
with the name of sympathy , with the name of teaching culture or giving
education and etc. Magistrate seduces woman under the power and under the label
of civilization. Does he is civilized ? Borders,
torture, sexual power and humiliations and pain of black people become the most
important aspect to study the civilized society.
To Evaluate My assignment Click Here.
To Evaluate My assignment Click Here.
Existentialism is not gloomy term. It is philosophical term which is used
in literature. Jean Paul Stare, Martin Esslin, and Albert Camus use this term
in their work. Existentialism is attitude to see the life with new perspective
and it's all about 'Lived experience' and Consciousness of Mind.
Existentialists deals with the subject matters like.... Death,
Meaninglessness of life, What is importance of God in human life ,
Interpersonal relationship which is existed and what is the meaning of all
those things and so many others things which we all are doing without any
purpose in life. That all things are connected with existential crisis.
It is movement in which
three things are more important like.....
1. Freedom
2. Passion
3. Individualism
In
this we find that existentialists reject the 'divine perspective' because with
divinity immortality automatically comes. Existentialism deals with such
questions like............... Who we are? From where we come ? What is the purpose of
our existence ? What we are doing and
why ? Such question remain unanswered because it reflects with mystery
and lived experience.
As
human being what we are doing? 'Nothing' means we just kill our
time to wait our final destination -
death only. Though death is the ultimate
truth of the life people can't accept it very easily because...............
"Our instinct of living life is more powerful than Death"
"We acquired the habit of breathing before acquired thinking."
Thus, Existentialism is all about
crisis of existence and purposeless of living life without doing significant
work in life. But those who don't understand this they goes
on living life happily and have idea of that "They are happy" as the
myth of Sisyphus suggest that concept of happiness. Without thinking goes on to
do action and make mind that "We are Happy."
"Thinking is not worst........What is terrible is to have
thought."
Ø Let's discuss existentialism in
the novel 'Waiting For Barbarian'.
When we talk about existentialism how can we forget Samuel Bucket's great work
'Waiting for Godot'. The play 'Waiting For Godot' stands for absurdity
of life and meaninglessness of life
which we all are doing in our life until the final destination of life - Death. Title of the both play 'Waiting for
Godot' and novel 'Waiting For Barbarian'
also suggest the "ceaseless waiting ". Waiting is always irritating for everybody.
- Existential Crisis in the novel 'Waiting For Barbarians'
Yes, I feel the effect of
existential crisis or meaninglessness of human existence in the rational and
indifference universe in the novel also- Waiting for Barbarians." people of empire ,They all are waiting for Barbarians
and in between they just killing time doing insignificant actions. They have
fear to lose the power over people. They have fear of their own identity what
happen with them if Barbarians will come
? we read this text with existential theory as it has the aspect of absurdity of life or meaninglessness or purposeless life
which they are living.
They
all are in search of Barbarians though they don't know who they are ? Why they
are waiting for them? Why they have to come ?
When they come? or the most important question is Do they exist or not ?
What makes difference to them if they (barbarians) will come? as Vladimir and
Estragon don't know why they are waiting for Godot? Why he has to come? Does he
come same pace ? such all questioned remain unanswered throughout the life.
v 'Waiting' is in center :
The subject of the
novel is not Barbarians but Waiting as the play has concept of
waiting not Godot.
"A Waiting that has no solution expect keeping on waiting"
As Waiting is the experience of time
and action, it defines many things. Waiting
is essential human condition and it gives some hope, too. Identity of Godot constantly gives disappointment to
Vladimir and Estragon because Godot never comes but hope is alive. The same way
Barbarians do not come on the stage as Godot never comes but still they alive
in mind of people.
"Essences never change."
In 'Waiting for Godot'..................
"Nothing happens ,nobody comes, nobody goes ,it's awful!."
The same way idea of barbarians
remains as idea only. They can't come and people become disappointed though
they don't know who they are ? Why they come ? What is the purpose f their
coming? They are not waiting for
barbarians with pleasure but hey constantly go on threat what will happen with
their identity if they come? This ceaseless waiting stands for Empire's continuous
barbarian attack and also refers the individual life.
They all say that..........."Because
Barbarians are coming today."
'Waiting' as the existential expression
of purposelessness is present through the concept of the Empire and also appears
in Magistrate's description of his life.( The existential Crisis of Coetzee's
protagonists in Waiting for the Barbarians and Disgrace p4) waiting embodies the existential notion of the
purposelessness of the existence. The individual is
born into the world of limits and suffering, doomed to wait until the death.
The torture, an obvious violation of the humanity
of the aboriginals, is a liberty taken by the Empire to impose the theory that
its own will and intentions are more crucial than the rights of those that it
is conquering over barbarian.
“Shall I tell you what I sometimes wish? I wish that
these barbarians would rise up and teach us a lesson, so that we may learn to
respect them. We think of the country here as ours, part of our Empire—our
outpost, our settlement, our market centre.”
It is the clear reflection How far fear and anxiety can go
and how far members of society can follow a blind power In the novel ,
there is no clear identification who is civilized and who is barbarian but when
we read above quote there is some hint
that civilized persons behave like
barbarians. They become more brutal, wild among each other. They forget their
own civilization.
'Culture we all have but civilization can't have all.'
Doing
waiting of Barbarian, they all become barbarian with their thoughts , with
their own behaviors and in actions. It is truly said that.............
"The more things change ,
the more they are same. That is the terrible stability of the world."
In term of 'Waiting' , Empire has nothing to do without
doing waiting. Empire is trying to gain power to rule or gaining purpose of their existence giving
the name of 'Other' to Barbarian. They
are uncivilized because Magistrate and governments are existed within the empire not outside.
v Existence of Empire :
The empire exist only in relation
to Barbarians. If Barbarians exist or 'Other' are there then Empire gain power
to rule over them. Existence of the
empire is depended on the existence of barbarians.
If barbarians are not existed then who know that empire is powerful or who say
that empire has the whole power control. Means...If barbarians are existed then
and then empire will be existed in the world. Many characters are powerless and
then there is the idea of powerful characters, In
within the empire oppressed are existed and then there is the oppressor like
Magistrate.
Magistrate lose his power and
authority after coming of colonel Joll. Losing power and authority within the
empire leads to think about his presence
in empire and meaninglessness of his existence. He also loses power over women.
"The Empire fades; the
barbarians remain."
Coetzee traces psychological perspective of these oppressors
as they become aware of the existential existence. The magistrate or people claim on Women's body in order to gain power
over the 'Other'. In the text The existential
questioning that all individuals are confronted with does not result in
oppression necessarily. (The
existential Crisis of Coetzee's protagonists in Waiting for the Barbarians and Disgrace p -14,15) Power
relation in relationship also describes the
purposelessness of magistrate's existence with extra relationship with barbarians women.
As we grasp the full force of Mr. Coetzee's
title , adapted from some lines by Greek poet Cavafy : What does
this sudden uneasiness , mean and the confusion?................Because it is night
and the barbarians have not come ,and some men have arrived from the frontiers
and they say that there are no barbarians any longer and now, What will
become of us without barbarians?
These people were kind of solution.(A
stark political Fable of South Africa)
Thus , Writer expresses role of existentialism
in cycle of oppression, in relationship
of having existence of barbarians, and also read through political losing the power and authority to rule over
"Other". They don't remain significant as such though significant is
only illusion of them. So, existence of something or any one depends on so many things not only one.
- Epilogue :
After discussing the novel with great philosophical concern with 'Existentialism', Nothing remains as such significant and that's how 'Waiting', Meaninglessness and purposelessness of life reflects in the novel "Waiting For the Barbarians". Absurdity of life clearly presented through the power politics, and its oppression in empire.
To Evaluate my assignment Click Here.
Works Cited
Article, The New
York Times: Book Review search. A STARK POLITICALFBLE OF SOUTH AFRICA.
18 April 1982. 15 March 2016.
Coetzee, J M. Waiting For the Barbarians. London:
Random House , 1997.
Joshi, Bhumi V. My review on movie - 'Waiting for Godot'.
5 October 2015. 15 March 2016 <http://bhumijoshi.blogspot.in>.
Rikhye, Sonya. "The Existntial Crisis of Coetzee's
Protagonist in Waiting For Barbarians and Disgrace." The University of
North Carolina . 2008.
Sometimes such things are becoming opposite like to prove something itself proving us as emperor became real barbarian to prove other as barbarian.
ReplyDelete